Here are a few case studies of recent projects that illustrate our key areas of work

 

POLICY AND DECISION-MAKING TOOLS AND APPROACHES

 

  • EVALUATION OF THE BIODIVERSITY OFFSETTING PILOT PHASE

CEP with the Institute of European Environmental Planning (IEEP) were commissioned by Defra (Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs) to undertake a two-year (2012-2014) evaluation of the six biodiversity offsetting pilots and complementary projects.

The evaluation considered how biodiversity offsetting can:

  • Help to use resources more effectively to deliver greater benefits for biodiversity.
  • Streamline the process of agreeing compensation for biodiversity loss as required by planning policy, in a cost effective way.

The evaluation was of a dynamic and developing policy area and required close working with Defra, Natural England, the biodiversity offsetting pilots and other 'strategic stakeholders'

The evaluation was of a dynamic and developing policy area and required close working with Defra, Natural England, the biodiversity offsetting pilots and other ‘strategic stakeholders’

The project involved detailed qualitative research, with a diversity of partners and stakeholders, into the planning system and its current and potential consideration of biodiversity. The project also included research looking at the existing costs of biodiversity compensation within the English planning system (this informed the counterfactual for the evaluation) and a review of the German approach to biodiversity offsetting.

The final evaluation report and supplementary reports are published on Defra’s project webpage or contact Collingwood Environmental Planning’s Dr Bill Sheate (Technical Director) w.sheate@cep.co.uk

 

  • MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF NATURE IMPROVEMENT AREAS: PHASE 2

CEP with partners GeoData Institute and Cascade Consulting were commissioned by Defra (Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs), in collaboration with Natural England, to undertake the Monitoring and Evaluation of the Nature Improvement Areas Phase 2 project. Nature Improvement Areas (NIA) are places where a shared vision for the development of the natural environment exists among a wide partnership of local people, including statutory and voluntary sectors.

The NIA Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Phase 2 project is a three year project (February 2013 – November 2015) with the following overall aims:

  • Gather evidence of approaches used within the NIAs and their outcomes, to maximise learning from the pilots and build a practical evidence base to inform future extension of the NIA approach.
  • Assess the individual and aggregated contribution of the NIA pilots towards meeting the outcomes included in the Natural Environment White Paper and other agreed policy outcomes.

The NIAs are a diverse, broad based partnerships with a wide remit and the evaluation has responded by including a wide range of information sources to meet the project’s aims.

The project combines qualitative research methods, online indicator based monitoring and detailed thematic investigations, for instance: exploring monitoring and evaluating habitat management activities at the landscape scale and social and economic well-being benefits; the development and testing of innovative approaches to understanding the counterfactual for landscape scale initiatives; and the development of lessons for future landscape scale monitoring and evaluation programmes.

The final evaluation reports are published on Defra’s project webpage or contact Collingwood Environmental Planning’s: Owen White (Principal Consultant) o.white@cep.co.uk Ric Eales (Managing Director) r.eales@cep.co.uk

 

CAPACITY BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT

 

  • EVALUATION OF THE CATCHMENT-BASED APPROACH – PILOT STAGE

Cascade Consulting (lead company), CEP, eftec and Yvonne Rees with Prof. Kevin Collins (Open University) and Dr Nigel Watson (University of Lancaster) undertook the evaluation of the pilot phase of Defra’s Catchment Based Approach (CaBA).

Pop-up workshops were one of many approaches to collaborative river management that the evaluation identified. These approaches, techniques and tools were included in a Guide to Collaborative Catchment Management (led by CEP) which aimed to provide examples and insights for those people involved in Catchment Initiatives.

The pilots were part of the UK Government’s review of river basin planning (RBP) strategy in the context of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). The Government’s aim was that the 25 pilots would provide a means for stakeholders to learn how to develop effective, partnership-based approaches for catchment improvement.

The evaluation used a mixed-method approach including a learning programme for the pilots that was led by CEP. The summative work involved multiple surveys, reviews of outputs, cost/benefit assessment and in-depth case studies (led by CEP) involving interviews, focus groups and document analysis. The project team worked closely with Defra (Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs) and the Environment Agency team so that the results of the evaluation informed the development of the policy framework for catchment management in England.

For further information see Defra’s project webpage or contact Collingwood Environmental Planning’s Paula Orr (Principal Consultant) p.orr@cep.co.uk or Clare Twigger-Ross (Technical Director) c.twigger-ross@cep.co.uk

 

KNOWLEDGE BROKERAGE

 

  • FLOOD RESILIENCE COMMUNITY PATHFINDER EVALUATION

The increase in the risk of flooding as a result of extreme weather and climate change make it essential for local authorities and communities to take ownership of this issue. Defra (Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs) provided grant funding to 13 local authorities throughout England under a new Community Flood Resilience Pathfinder Scheme aimed at stimulating community action to increase resilience. The measures developed included property-level protection, flood resilience groups, volunteer flood wardens and community champions, engagement with more vulnerable groups and efforts to increase financial resilience. 

The REA identified many definitions of resilience. Steiner and Markantoni (2013) introduced the four components of "social resilience" which, with other frameworks and approaches, supported the development of an indicator framework for flood resilie…

The REA identified many definitions of resilience. Steiner and Markantoni (2013) introduced the four components of “social resilience” which, with other frameworks and approaches, supported the development of an indicator framework for flood resilience for the pathfinder communities.

The CEP-led evaluation followed UK Government good practice guidance – specifically the Magenta Book. It includes a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) to provide an overview and synthesis of the available evidence on the topic to inform the development of an evaluation framework. Team coordinators worked with each of the pathfinder projects to understand their focus and priorities and any methods of evaluation they had put in place. The evaluation was carried out over the entire pathfinder period and reported on the progress made by the individual projects and on the results and impacts of the scheme, identifying lessons for building community resilience in the future.The evaluation also used a series of indicators of community resilience to evaluate changes in outcomes within the Pathfinders.

The evaluation built on Cutter et al.’s (2010) model for categorising community resilience capacities/resources and discussed the pathfinder project interventions in terms of the five resilience categories: social, institutional, infrastructure, economic and community capital.

The CEP consortium included: the Flood Hazard Research Centre at Middlesex University; the University of SurreyNorthumbria University; the Centre for Evidence and Policy at King’s College London; and nef consulting Limited.

For further information see Defra’s project webpage or contact Collingwood Environmental Planning’s Paula Orr (Principal Consultant) p.orr@cep.co.uk or Clare Twigger-Ross (Technical Director) 

 

GOVERNANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY

 

  • BLOSSOM – BRIDGING LONG-TERM SCENARIO AND STRATEGY ANALYSIS: ORGANISATION AND METHODS

Across the 12 EU Member States included in the study there has been a sustained increase in the interest and engagement with forward looking analysis. This can be seen in the number of ‘futures bodies’ within Member State Governments, as shown in the figure above (Figure 4.2).

CEP, with Milieu and Stockholm Environment Institute, developed the BLOSSOM approach for the European Environment Agency (EEA) to understand the extent to which long-term perspectives were embedded in policy making. We undertook a study of the use, impacts and effectiveness of scenario planning in environmental policy across the EU. A comparative analysis of eight country case-studies (later extended to 12) explored similarities and differences between the countries, and between content (whether certain topics were receiving more attention than others) and process factors (role and function alongside the cycle of policy-making). We also explored the benefits of different organisational and institutional approaches. The project covered the EU with country case studies in Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom was completed in 2010. A further separate BLSSOM project for Switzerland (for the Federal Office for the Environment) was completed by CEP in 2013.

For more information please contact Owen White o.white@cep.co.uk (Principal Consultant) or Dr Bill Sheate w.sheate@cep.co.uk (Technical Director)

 

Research and Creative Thinking

 

  • e-Highway 2050

The e-Highway2050 project is a 40 month project which started in September 2012 and is supported by the EU Seventh Framework Programme. It aims to develop a methodology that can support the planning of the Pan-European Transmission Network – i.e. the electricity transmission network to serve the European Union and beyond – to ensure the reliable delivery of existing and potential new sources of renewable electricity as well as supporting the integration of the wider pan-European market. The project looks to the future, to the period 2020-2050, and will result in a modular development plan for implementing possible future electricity transmission grids.

CEP provided the following to this large and multi-disciplinary project:

CEP worked with the e-Highway team and key stakeholders to develop videos capturing some of the opinions about the e-Highway project and the risks and opportunities of this work

  • Supporting the setting of social and environmental ‘boundary conditions’ for grid planning 2020-2050 (i.e. what are the likely social and environmental opportunities and limitations).
  • A methodological approach for the environmental and sustainability assessment (SESA) of the proposed grid architectures according to different scenarios for 2050.
  • Contributing to the development of potential environmental and social indicators as part of the Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) Multicriteria Analysis (MCA).

For further information please contact Collingwood Environmental Planning’s: Ric Eales (Managing Director) r.eales@cep.co.uk Dr Bill Sheate (Technical Director) w.sheate@cep.co.uk Dr Clare Twigger-Ross (Technical Director) c.twigger-ross@cep.co.uk

 

  • National Ecosystem Assessment Follow on Project – Ecosystem Services and Environmental Assessment

CEP’s William Sheate and Jonathan Baker were part of the Core Team of two separate parts of the National Ecosystem Assessment (NEA) follow on project.

The NEAT tree (above) is the main outcome of the TABLES research, this tool is intended to support decision makers by providing guidance on the selection and use of tools that have been adapted to incorporate the principles of the Ecosystem Approach…

The NEAT tree (above) is the main outcome of the TABLES research, this tool is intended to support decision makers by providing guidance on the selection and use of tools that have been adapted to incorporate the principles of the Ecosystem Approach.

The Tools: Applications Benefits and Linkages for Ecosystems (TABLES)

This project had the principal aim of mainstreaming the principles of the ecosystem approach by adapting public policy and decision-support tools within an ecosystem services framework to improve policy- and decision-making processes and outcomes.

Barriers and Enablers to Embedding an Ecosystems Framework in Appraisal

The aim of the research was to investigate capacities and constraints to embedding consideration of ecosystem services in policy decision making through different forms of appraisal: policy-level impact assessment (IA), strategic environmental assessment (SEA) and environmental impact assessment (EIA) – with a specific focus on the role played by institutional behaviours and cultures as both barriers and enablers at micro, meso and macro scales.

For further information please contact Collingwood Environmental Planning’s Dr Bill Sheate (Technical Director) w.sheate@cep.co.uk

 

  • Evidence review: Locality and community climate change resilience

CEP has been commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) to understand the key components, barriers and facilitators of community resilience in the context of climate change. Understanding what works at the local level to build resilience to climate change in terms of mitigation of shocks and adaptation to stresses remains a complex challenge for UK policy and practice.

The project will consider the relationship between community resilience and wider institutional and societal resilience; and social and spatial vulnerability to climate change. The final report will include insights from existing evidence and emerging practice on the current picture of local climate resilience in the UK and how this could be enhanced in different contexts.

For further information please contact Dr Clare Twigger-Ross at CEP c.twigger-ross@cep.co.uk